Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Love & Death (album)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Love & Death (album) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable bootleg —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:29, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:12, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - For the 500th time the nominator should look at WP:JNN. Regardless, this album could be better described as a counterfeit item that was probably made by crooks who don't even know where the songs came from and who's on them. With an artist as important as Nirvana, the presence of supposedly rare recordings on this product should have generated real media and fan response, but it hasn't. I can find no coverage of the album's existence beyond some blogs that appear to cater to a crooked crowd. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:08, 2 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.